THE COMMON GOOD AND THE GOOD LIVING IN FRONT OF THE ECONOMIC GLOBALIZATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The common good leads us to the metaphysical reflection of philosophical knowledge; While good living, to the implementation of a political, economic, cultural and social thesis the knowledge of the human intellect. From this perspective we were asked? What is the influence of economic globalization on the "common good" and "good living"?. It is based on the criterion that the "common good" is generic and "good living" is the specific. It follows that the "common good" is intended for "good living", and conversely, "good living" is supposed to have "the common good" as its goal. Both legal categories represent the search for material and spiritual welfare of the social being. The "common good" is the end of the state; And that the path of "good living" is the application of the legal regime of good living established in Article 341 and 342 of the Constitution of the Republic and that the stony road to reach it is the application of justice, equality, Freedom, equity and human solidarity. From the analysis made, it is based on the conception that the current process of economic globalization is involved most of the countries of the world, a fact that was not produced at the beginning of the 20th century, whose construction of the global markets corresponds to the interests of the companies Multinationals that have undermined the sovereignty of underdeveloped countries in economic, political and social decisions; In which we can affirm that a world economy has been configured qualitatively different from the one that existed a few decades ago; Which has modified a culture of each region; Has displaced labor and the transparency of technological knowledge across international borders and their cultural, political and environmental effects.
Downloads
Article Details
Derechos de autor:
La Revista Científica Espíritu Emprendedor TES conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia Creative Common Atribución -No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), se puede copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato, remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material siempre que:
- Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales.
- Usted debe citar la autoría y fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial, URL y DOI de la obra).
- Usted debe mencionar la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
References
Felizperezv. (23 de Noviembre de 2011). Felizperezv. Obtenido de Bien Común e Individual: https://www.scribd.com/doc/96067032/Bien-Comun-e-Individual
Gudynas, E. (2011). “Tensiones, contradicciones y oportunidades de la dimensión ambiental del Buen Vivir”. Bolivia: Gudynas .
Jaramillo, O. H. (2012). La ciencia y técnica del derecho. Introducción al Derecho. Loja: DYKINSON, S.L.
Lajo, L. J. (29 de Agosto de 2011). Voltairenet.org. Obtenido de Un modelo sumaq kawsay de gobierno: http://www.voltairenet.org/article171245.html
MiIler, M. (10 de enero de 2013). Grupo 5. . Obtenido de La Globalización neoliberal, Sus consecuencias para la humanidad.: http://maurihno.blogspot.com/2013/07/la-globalizacion-neoliberal-y-sus.html
Rawls, J. (2002). Teoría de la justicia, Liberalismo político. Estados Unidos : Universidad Harvard.
Telégrafo, E. (18 de Diciembre de 2016). ¿Qué es el Sumak Kawsay? . El Telégrafo , pág. 6.
Unceta, K. (12 de diciembre de 2011). Ecuador Debate. Acerca del Buen Vivir, Quito: Centro Andino de Acción Popular CAAP. Obtenido de El buen vivir frente a la globalización : http://hdl.handle.net/10469/3546
Universo, E. (22 de Julio de 2008). El Universo. Obtenido de TÍTULO VII RÉGIMEN DEL BUEN VIVIR: https://www.eluniverso.com/2008/07/22/0001/8/1791358EEDC542018A703464E6E3239D.html